Current:Home > NewsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -VitalWealth Strategies
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-13 02:55:25
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (634)
Related
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- 'I got you!' Former inmate pulls wounded Houston officer to safety after shootout
- Bill Cosby accuser files new lawsuit under expiring New York survivors law
- Why Sharon Osbourne Cautions Against Ozempic Use After Dropping to Under 100 Lbs.
- Vance jokes he’s checking out his future VP plane while overlapping with Harris at Wisconsin airport
- Would Lions coach Dan Campbell ditch Detroit to take over Texas A&M football?
- US military says national security depends on ‘forever chemicals’
- K-Pop star Rose joins first lady Jill Biden to talk mental health
- Bet365 ordered to refund $519K to customers who it paid less than they were entitled on sports bets
- World's first gene therapy for sickle cell and thalassemia approved in the U.K.
Ranking
- Louisiana high court temporarily removes Judge Eboni Johnson Rose from Baton Rouge bench amid probe
- Dwyane Wade Reveals the Secret to His and Gabrielle Union's Successful Marriage
- In death, one cancer patient helps to erase millions in medical debt
- Would Lions coach Dan Campbell ditch Detroit to take over Texas A&M football?
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Spain’s Pedro Sánchez beat the odds to stay prime minister. Now he must keep his government in power
- High-ranking Mormon church leader Russell Ballard remembered as examplar of the faith
- Charissa Thompson responds to backlash after admitting making up NFL sideline reports
Recommendation
Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
What's ahead for travelers during Thanksgiving 2023
New Research Makes it Harder to Kick The Climate Can Down the Road from COP28
3 shot in van leaving Maryland funeral, police searching for suspect
Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
Guatemalan prosecutors request that President-elect Bernardo Arévalo be stripped of immunity
DA says gun charge dropped against NYC lawmaker seen with pistol at protest because gun did not work
Prices fall, unemployment rises and Boomers have all the houses