Current:Home > MarketsThe White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars -VitalWealth Strategies
The White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars
Rekubit View
Date:2025-04-06 15:14:16
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration is putting pharmaceutical companies on notice, warning them that if the price of certain drugs is too high, the government might cancel their patent protection and allow rivals to make their own versions.
Under a plan announced Thursday, the government would consider overriding the patent for high-priced drugs that have been developed with the help of taxpayer money and letting competitors make them in hopes of driving down the cost.
In a 15-second video released to YouTube on Wednesday night, President Joe Biden promised the move would lower prices.
“Today, we’re taking a very important step toward ending price gouging so you don’t have to pay more for the medicine you need,” he said.
The administration did not immediately release details about how the process will work and how it will deem a drug costly enough to act. White House officials would not name drugs that might potentially be targeted.
There will be a 60-day public comment period. If the plan is enacted, drugmakers are almost certain to challenge it in court.
It’s the latest health policy pitch from a White House gearing up to make its efforts to tackle drug prices a central theme in next year’s reelection campaign. Biden frequently talks about the $35 cap on insulin for Medicare enrollees that went into effect this year, as well as a plan for government officials to negotiate some drug prices paid by Medicare for the first time in history.
The federal government, however, has never taken such a move against patents, a step called “march-in rights.” But some Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, has in recent years lobbied the Health and Human Services agency to do so with certain drugs.
The conditions for how those “march-in rights” would be used have long been debated. Pharmaceutical companies have pushed back on the idea that prices alone are enough for Washington to act against a drug’s patent. The process proposed by the administration would clarify that the drug’s patent could be in jeopardy if its price is out of reach for Americans, White House officials said.
“For the first time, ever, the high price of that taxpayer-funded drug is a factor in determining that the drug is not accessible to the public on reasonable terms,” said Biden domestic policy adviser Neera Tanden.
The plan could threaten future drugs, according to the pharmaceutical lobbying firm Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA.
“This would be yet another loss for American patients who rely on public-private sector collaboration to advance new treatments and cures,” PhRMA spokesperson Megan Van Etten said.
Pharmaceutical companies have long relied on government research to develop new drugs. The most recent major breakthrough was the development of COVID-19 vaccines. U.S. taxpayers invested billions of dollars in the effort and were able, until recently, to access treatments and preventions for the virus without paying out-of-pocket for them.
When the public invests heavily in a private company’s drug, it’s fair to question whether they should have to pay high prices for it, said William Pierce, a former HHS official during President George W. Bush’s administration.
“The question becomes – what reward should there be for the taxpayers who help fund this product?” Pierce said.
veryGood! (747)
Related
- Boy who wandered away from his 5th birthday party found dead in canal, police say
- Powerball winning numbers for October 5: Jackpot rises to $295 million
- Verizon says network disruption is resolved; FCC investigating outage
- ACC power rankings: Miami clings to top spot, Florida State bottoms out after Week 6
- NCAA President Charlie Baker would be 'shocked' if women's tournament revenue units isn't passed
- How did the Bills lose to Texans? Baffling time management decisions cost Buffalo
- College Football Playoff predictions: Projecting who would make 12-team field after Week 6
- Chicago mayor names new school board after entire panel resigns amid a fight over district control
- Elon Musk’s Daughter Vivian Calls Him “Absolutely Pathetic” and a “Serial Adulterer”
- TikToker Taylor Rousseau Grigg Detailed Health Struggles in One of Her Final Videos Before Her Death
Ranking
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Georgia elections chief doesn’t expect Helene damage to have big effect on voting in the state
- Miss Teen Rodeo Kansas Emma Brungardt Dead at 19 After Car Crash
- Helene victims face another worry: Bears
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Trump and Harris mark somber anniversary of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Authorities are investigating after a Frontier Airlines plane lands with fire in one engine
- How Hurricane Milton, Hurricane Helene Got Its Name: Breaking Down the Storm-Identifying Process
Recommendation
'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
Lakers' Bronny James focusing on 'being a pest on defense' in preseason
Andrew Garfield recalls sex scene with Florence Pugh went 'further' because they didn't hear cut
LeBron James and son Bronny become first father-son duo to play together in NBA history
A New York Appellate Court Rejects a Broad Application of the State’s Green Amendment
The Latest: New analysis says both Trump and Harris’ plans would increase the deficit
Jax Taylor Refiles for Divorce From Brittany Cartwright With Lawyer's Help
Andrew Garfield recalls sex scene with Florence Pugh went 'further' because they didn't hear cut