Current:Home > StocksAppeals court weighs whether to let stand Biden’s approval of Willow oil project in Alaska -VitalWealth Strategies
Appeals court weighs whether to let stand Biden’s approval of Willow oil project in Alaska
View
Date:2025-04-11 15:12:38
JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — An appeals court panel is deciding whether to let stand the Biden administration’s approval of the massive Willow oil project in a federal petroleum reserve on Alaska’s North Slope.
Environmentalists and a grassroots group called Sovereign Iñupiat for a Living Arctic are seeking to have last March’s approval overturned. Arguments before a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel Monday in San Francisco focused largely on the groups’ claims that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management did not consider a “reasonable” range of alternatives in its review and limited its consideration of alternatives to those that allowed for full-field development of the project by ConocoPhillips Alaska.
The court did not immediately rule.
Amy Collier, a U.S. Justice Department attorney, told the court the federal agencies involved complied with their legal obligations. Jason Morgan, an attorney for ConocoPhillips Alaska, said Willow wasn’t presented on a “blank slate” — that prior lease decisions providing a right to develop subject to restrictions and a plan governing where development in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska can take place also were part of the equation.
“Context is very important,” Morgan said.
In court documents, he and other attorneys for the company said the leases in ConocoPhillips’ Bear Tooth Unit are in areas open to leasing and surface development and that the Bureau of Land Management committed the unit to development in issuing leases there over a period of years. Willow is in the unit, in the northeast part of the petroleum reserve.
Two separate lawsuits seek to overturn the project’s approval. A coalition of environmentalists in one of the cases argues the Bureau of Land Management predicated its assessment “on the flawed premise that it must allow ConocoPhillips to extract all economically viable oil from its leases and assessed only a narrow range of action alternatives that each allowed nearly identical oil production.”
The groups are challenging U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason’s decision in November upholding Willow’s approval. She found ConocoPhillips Alaska has the right to develop its leases in the reserve “subject to reasonable restrictions and mitigation measures imposed by the federal government.” She found the Bureau of Land Management “did consider the requisite reasonable range of alternatives based on the Project’s purpose and need.”
Work on the project is underway after Gleason and an appeals court rejected efforts by the environmental groups to block winter activities, including construction of new gravel roads, while the appeals are being heard.
State political and union leaders have endorsed Willow, and the project has broad support among Alaska Native leaders on the North Slope and groups with ties to the region who see Willow as economically vital for their communities.
Climate activists see the project at odds with President Joe Biden’s pledges to combat climate change. The administration has defended its climate record.
It is estimated that using the oil from Willow would produce the equivalent of about 263 million tons (239 million metric tons) of greenhouse gases over the project’s 30-year life, roughly equal to the combined emissions from 1.7 million passenger cars over the same time period.
ConocoPhillips Alaska proposed five drilling sites for Willow but the bureau approved three, which it said would include up to 199 total wells. The project could produce up to 180,000 barrels of oil a day at its peak. Supporters say that would be significant for the trans-Alaska pipeline, which hit its peak for throughput in 1988 with an average of about 2 million barrels per day.
An average of about 470,000 barrels a day coursed through the pipeline last year.
veryGood! (8792)
Related
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Local governments are spending billions of pandemic relief funds, but some report few specifics
- The Blind Side: Michael Oher’s Former Football Coach Says He Knows What He Witnessed With Tuohys
- You’ll Bow Down to This Deleted Scene From Red, White & Royal Blue
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Texas giving athletic director Chris Del Conte extension, raise
- New York governor blocks discharge of radioactive water into Hudson River from closed nuclear plant
- George Santos says ex-fundraiser caught using a fake name tried a new tactic: spelling it backwards
- From bitter rivals to Olympic teammates, how Lebron and Steph Curry became friends
- 'Swamp Kings': Florida football docuseries rehashes Gators' era of success and swagger
Ranking
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- The U.S. imports most of its solar panels. A new ruling may make that more expensive
- Metals, government debt, and a climate lawsuit
- 'Deep, dark, rich and complex': Maker's Mark to release first old bourbon in 70-year history
- Connie Chiume, South African 'Black Panther' actress, dies at 72
- IRS agent fatally shot during training exercise at north Phoenix firing range
- Succession Actress Crystal Finn Details Attack by Otters
- Human trafficking: A network of crime hidden across a vast American landscape
Recommendation
Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear ready to campaign for Harris-Walz after losing out for spot on the ticket
Will PS4 servers shut down? Here's what to know.
AP Week in Pictures: Global | Aug 11 - Aug. 18, 2023
Hairy ears of male mosquitoes help them find the ladies. Can we disrupt their hearing?
Louisiana high court temporarily removes Judge Eboni Johnson Rose from Baton Rouge bench amid probe
USWNT general manager Kate Markgraf parts ways with team after early World Cup exit
Leading politician says victory for Niger’s coup leaders would be ‘the end of democracy’ in Africa
North Carolina laws curtailing transgender rights prompt less backlash than 2016 ‘bathroom bill’